Home / Technology / Review: 2022 Norco Sight C1 VLT – A long range eMTB

Review: 2022 Norco Sight C1 VLT – A long range eMTB



Falling

The most notable feature of the Sights design is the length of the chain stay. At 462mm, it’s a little longer than most e-bikes these days. This means that it is very balanced and composed in fast, flat or outside corners, because it is easy to keep a lot of weight on the front plate. The fork is always loaded and pushes the tire into the ground, providing consistent grip with a neutral or even slightly backward driving position. The long rear end results in more strain on the fork, which partly explains why I needed to set it up quite firmly to hold it up and stop it.

The downside of all this space behind is that the bike is a lump to manual and bunny hop, even by e-bike standards. I like a longer chain stay on a pedal bike, but combined with the heavy battery that extends in front of the bottom bracket, it makes lifting the front wheel very hard work. Sure, I can bunny-jump this bike, and I can get it up to the balance point in a manual, but it̵

7;s a lot more effort, requires more planning, and I can not remove any obstacles that I could with a shorter rear center. I consider myself quite good at bunnyhops, and standing 190 cm tall is also a clear advantage, so for shorter or less experienced drivers, the long rear center can be even more limiting when it comes to cycling dynamically.

Also, in steep terrain with rocky steps or little departure in corners, I do not always feel completely centered on the bike, as if my weight is also far above the front at times. This can be improved with a higher bar, but I think the chain bar is a little longer than ideal for steep terrain. There is always a backside, and in this case there is excellent stability at high speeds and turns in flatter or less technical terrain. Sight likes to go fast and does very well on derelict trails, jumps and flat turns, but is more difficult on difficult rock sections where you will get the front wheel up and over technical trail functions.

The shock comes without installed volume spacers, which I found resulted in the bike tying a little too easily, and at the same time the agility over small shocks was not too impressive by ebike standards. I tried to lighten the compression at low speed to improve the sensitivity to small shocks and increase the compression at high speed to take the energy out of larger hits, but what worked best was to add a volume spacer and reduce the pressure a bit. It is not the most plow-like, but it gives good flexibility without bottoming out too often when set up like this.

Overall, the front and rear suspension work well together, and provide a good balance between sensitivity and support. The Fox 36 e-MTB fork has a thinner crown and thicker support walls than the regular 36 (this results in a smaller piston area which means higher spring pressure); it never feels flexible or overwhelmed in large holes or square bumps. However, I can not help but feel that the bike would only work better with a little more travel, especially considering that the real journey is a little less than 150 mm according to my measurements.

The rigid mass of the e-bike frame makes it far easier to use all travel on big hits compared to a pedal bike; As a result, you have to drive the suspension a little stiffer, so braking dips and overturning are less of an issue, and the pedal bob doesn’t really matter at all. Norco’s Range VLT, which has 20 mm more travel at each end, would be a better bet in my eyes because the extra travel has very little disadvantage on an e-bike. More Try to manual with your shock banned if you are not convinced. But it’s Sight’s long chain stay length that is the main problem for me. Combined with the weight, it blurs the response in some situations, and in my opinion the fun is a bit blunt as well.



Source link