Apple said: "We urge the government to stand by their stated intention not to weaken encryption or force suppliers to build systemic weaknesses in their products." Apple explained its complaints about six points:
- Exaggerating broad powers that could impair cyber security and encryption
- Lack of appropriate independent judicial review
- Technical requirements based only on government's subjective perception of reason and opportunity
- Outstanding requirements
- Extraterritoriality and Global Influence
Apple's backdoors against backdoors (which provide law enforcement access to devices) are not a new development, but their continued fight against backdoors is worth noting. In 201
However, Apple liked the Australian government for their willingness to work with the company and others, while warning that the bill is still unsuitable, says: "We appreciate the government's appeal to Apple and other companies during the preparation of this bill. We are pleased that some of the proposed proposals improve legislation, the unfortunate fact is that the draft legislation remains dangerously ambiguous in terms of encryption and security. "
The Australian Parliament accepts submissions to the bill's review until October 12. TechCrunch uploaded Apple's full statement, which you can read here.