Apple's privacy statement is clear: it will do its best to comply with law enforcement, but believes that creating a backdoor for the operating system is the wrong thing to do.
Today, Apple has commented (via TechCrunch ) on Australia's anti-encryption bill, noting that it's "dangerous ambiguous" and "alarming for all Australian."
To break down, the bill is paid as Access and Assistance. This bill, if it becomes a law, forces technology companies operating in the country to help police and other intelligence services when trying to access encrypted data. The Australian government says that encryption is "increasingly used by terrorist groups and organized criminals to avoid detection and disturbance."
Of course, many people ̵
Surprisingly, Apple's attitude has not changed. It says that "it would be wrong to weaken the safety of millions of law-abiding customers to investigate the few that pose a threat."
Apple says it appreciates the government reaching out to it and other companies, "The unfortunate fact is that the draft legislation remains dangerously ambiguous in terms of encryption and security."
The company itself claims that the reduction of security and privacy will push "criminals farther offline", instead of catching them. Apple says that "this is not time to weaken encryption."
This is not the first time we've seen Apple taking a stand like this one. Two years ago, the FBI claimed that Apple needs to create a tool to bypass the encryption introduced by IOS. In fact, they asked Apple to create a back door to the operating systems, allowing the FBI to access. Of course, it was when we discovered that Apple should not make such a tool as it may be dangerous if you are wrong.
You can read the entire letter here.
Subscribe to 9to5Mac on YouTube for more Apple News: